Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/3/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because m2 work is not the only work that's going on. Not all work has
stopped. You are only speaking of the m2 conversion work. There are
other efforts underway.
Again, I don't follow. If a change is applied to trunk, why shouldn't
it be done to the branch, too? Wouldn't it ensure that the branch is
up-to-date?
Are you saying that *all* changes to the trunk should also be made to
your branch? Yikes!
I think I miss something obvious and you explain me
something assuming I've got all information you've got. I remember one
said in this mailing list that it's always worth to try it out in
action rather than discussing it over and over again.
The difference is that to make this fly, you need the cooperation of
everyone who is, or will be, checking in changes/fixes into trunk. This
is a big change and I'm not sure that we've been discussing this over
and over again. As a matter of fact, I kinda slightly feel that this is
abruptly stifling the discussion that's moving along quite nicely.
Regards,
Alan
Although it
doesn't work in all cases, it likely will in this one.
So, did this:
$ svn copy https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk \
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/m2migration \
-m "Creating a branch for M2 migration"
Committed revision 418926.
and a branch is ready at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/branches/m2migration/
I hope I didn't break anything and the only change in Geronimo repo is
the branch only ;-)
Jacek
