I've reviewed, applied, and built the patches.  +1

On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:32 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:

Rick,

I have reviewed your patches and they appear fine to me.

You get my +1.

Jeff


Rick McGuire wrote:
These two patches have been sitting in [RTC] state for 2 weeks now with
no activity.  The only votes received so far have been non-binding
ones.  These changes are holding up other work, including trying to
convince the James developers to convert to using the Geronimo javamail
version.

First issue, removing the javamail-transport module and replacing it
with a dependency on the javamail-provider jar.


NOTE:  The above patch is another example of an area where svn diff and
patch don't work well together.  Applying this patch will prompt for a
Reverse action on the patch.  It doesn't matter how you reply, because
after the patch applies, delete the javamail-transport module
subdirectory, and this should build ok.

Second issue, creating a new javamail 1.4 spec jar.


Rick



-sachin


Reply via email to