Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 7/11/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd recommend that projects using m2 wait for G 1.2, which will
hopefully be sooner rather than later.
Too late. For example, the Quartz plugin (already available on the
plugin repo) uses G 1.1 and Maven 2. I've been copying JARs around by
hand, which is annoying, and why I want to solve this. There are more
people getting involved in developing plugins, and it's hard to
recommend Maven 1 and hard to recommend file copying (and *extra* hard
to recommend waiting for Geronimo 1.2, given the current velocity).
You shouldn't need to hand copy M1 jars into an M2 repository. If the
repository declaration is correctly set up, Maven 2 will use the M1 jars
in an M1 repository.
If a project is using m2 and can't wait for G 1.2, then it should
setup a legacy repo and use the m1 artifacts.
OK, that's fine, but should it use the groupId "geronimo" or
"org.apache.geronimo.modules" when referring to, e.g.,
geronimo-kernel?
The groupId geronimo refers to the m1 jars and
org.apache.geronimo.modules will refer to the m2 jars.
Regards,
Alan
