+1 for trunk.
For the branches/1.1.1 would this be in the vein of fixing bugs? I'm fine with doing it but often
times a simple version number change ends up uncovering integration issues.
Let's give it a go. Who was going to do the work and does anyone think we need a JIRA for 1.1.1 ?
Might be nice as a heads up in the Release notes section and a JIRA automatically gets included.
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/7/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the "Derby library does not have line number debug information" mail
thread [1] a few weeks ago I asked whether people wanted to upgrade to
the Derby 10.1.3 maintenance release [2].
David Jencks was the only person who mentioned it should go in the 1.1.1
release but did not hear any objections from others. If anyone
disagrees with this plan, please speak up before I start looking into
this next week.
+1 plus committing the change to trunk that I think is implied by
default to any modification to any branch.
Jacek
