Dain Sundstrom wrote: > I think we are starting to agree. agreed :-)
I think that a Cluster interface with the stateless methods as proposed by filip would be good, plus a SessionManager interface with the stateful stuff. Actually, I don't like SessionManager as a name... maybe StateManager? If the same bean implements both APIs, great! But I see no need for a common root. I am still keen on a context ID, but I'll advocate that in a separate email. cheers
