I did not turn them off... I just added a Jira to remind us that
these tests need to be fixed.
--jason
On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
The timer tests failed. Jason, I thought you pulled them out late last
night after our discussion.
Cheers
Prasad
On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The bootstrap on linux first failed a test in the security module. I
ran the build inside the security module. It passed successfully.
Then I ran bootstrap again. It failed while transferring an artifact.
Now I'm running mvn from top level. This is running.
Keeping my fingers crossed
Prasad
On 7/14/06, Prasad Kashyap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the latest changes on Windows and it builds the assembly
fine.
> I even ran the jetty binary successfully.
>
> Jason, I also tried commenting out a few builders from the
> dependencies list and it still worked fine. So I guess we can prune
> the deps list to remove the redudant ones.
>
> A full extract and bootstrap on Linux is running.
>
> Cheers
> Prasad
>
> On 7/14/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like the Maven 2 peeps are not going to be able to
take in
> > our patches to apply to the assembly plugin, which provides
mappers
> > and some includes/excludes to unpack and a permission related
fix to
> > files/file element processing.
> >
> > I believe that those changes will eventually make it in, but
for now
> > to get around the need Prasad and I talked about using the
dependency
> > plugin and the antrun plugin to perform the needed
"flattening" of
> > the schema files for the /schema/* in the assembly.
> >
> > I've implemented this already for the geronimo-jetty-j2ee
assembly in
> > the svkmerge/m2migration branch.
> >
> > It appears to function as expected. I've disabled the remaining
> > assemblies which have not yet been converted. Once they have
been
> > converted they will be re-enabled.
> >
> > Note, we are still using car:installConfigs... but we no
longer need
> > to have MASSEMBLY-45 or MASSEMBLY-127 applied to a custom 2.2-
> > SNAPSHOT version of the maven-assembly-plugin to build out
assemblies.
> >
> > The full conversation is here if anyone is interested:
> >
> > http://uwyn.com/drone/log/bevinbot/geronimo/20060714
> >
> > Starts with '19:53 <jdillon> any thoughts on using dependency +
> > antrun to setup the right bits and then use the 2.1 assembly
plugin?'
> > --jason
> >
>
