I'll move 'em elsewhere if you like; hopefully another open source CI server that doesn't suck will show up some place soon
On 7/18/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 17, 2006, at 10:32 PM, James Strachan wrote: > BTW it was me - I'm always on the look out of a CI server we can use > on OSS projects :). I'll try get the builds working. You were on my list of suspects... ;-) I think it's great to get the projects added and building. > > Does it really affect Geronimo if the builds fail? AFAIK build error > mail should be going to the Jencks & Lingo projects? No, it has no impact on Geronimo. However, I do occasionally make a sweep through http://ci.gbuild.org/continuum/target/ and try to get builds running. If failures are obviously project build/test problems, I usually ignore (unless it's a project that I'm working on). However, there are also surprisingly frequent environmental issues that need to be resolved (svn urls changing, manual clean up of build files, helping dependencies get resolved, etc). So, as I was tinkering with Jencks and Lingo trying to get the builds to work, I suddenly got the urge to stop... My note was the result... :-) --kevan > > On 7/17/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Somebody recently added Jencks and Lingo projects to Continuum >> running on GGbuild. That's all fine. However, the builds are failing. >> >> I tried fixing up the svn url being used for the Jencks project, but >> it's still failing. Could whoever added the projects fix things up so >> that the builds work? Otherwise, I'm going to delete them one week >> from today (July 24). If you have questions or problems, I'm happy to >> help (although I'm far from an expert...). >> >> --kevan >> > > > -- > > James > ------- > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
-- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
