Um... I have no clue when it comes to developing with Corba... and
hope not to need to start ;-)
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 9:13 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi All,
I was going to JIRA this but figured since there is a conversation
going on about the geronimo-spec-corba_2.3_spec jar I'd just post
first and then jira...
The CosNaming.NamingContext interface currently has the destroy
method commented out with a statement that its 'not implemented
yet'. Not sure if that is a hold over from trying to get things
working with the Sun corba impl or not but I figured I'd mention it
here and see if its already known or if a JIRA would be a good thing.
TTFN,
-bd-
One more thing is to uncomment the destroy method on the
CosNaming.NamingContext interface.
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:27 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 7:18 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
No. Both use that plugin. "new" uses the jacorb compiler (i.e.
<compiler>jacorb</compiler>). "old" uses idlj (i.e.
<compiler>idlj</compiler>).
Any reason why we don't revert to use <compiler>idlj</compiler> on
the new spec modules so we can use them?
Where are the sources for the geronimo-spec-corba 1.0 that we
are using? I looked at branches/1_0 and tags/1_0 and I found
that the greonimo-spec-corba pom has an artifactId of geronimo-
corba_2.3_spec.
Get the bucket out... The "old" corba spec is in geronimo/specs/
trunk/geronimo-spec-corba/. Well, technically, the tagged version
is in geronimo/specs/tags/1_1/geronimo-spec-corba/
Kay, found it... thx... really confusing how the older version
(1_0 tag) has newer artifactId's.
--jason
