Should we move these against the spec trunk as SNAPSHOTS? I think the time is ripe ;-) There are a few projects using this code base.
Jason Dillon wrote: > I'd be happy to work on this (with Alan?) after the m2conversion bits > are merged (maybe while waiting for RTC on that too). > > I still need to get the new javamail bits published too. > > --jason > > > On Jul 23, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > >> It would be really convenient if we could get these publishing to the >> apache snapshot repository. We are using the ejb3 spec in OpenEJB 3 >> and I know Greg is using the Servlet one. >> >> -dain >> >> On Jul 23, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>> Actually I contributed a few patches to the spec in the past and I >>> know that it was fully in sync with JPA specification final draft >>> (not sure about the rest of the specs on that branch). I am going to >>> diff it with the final release of the spec, but in any case those >>> will be just minor changes. >>> >>> I am building it locally at the moment. So is there any harm in >>> publishing it? >>> >>> Andrus >>> >>> >>> On Jul 23, 2006, at 5:35 PM, Jason Dillon wrote: >>>> Does not appear to be... the jpa spec bits are still experimental >>>> IIUC (only living in the specs/branches/jee5_exp branch). >>>> >>>> --jason >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jul 23, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does anyone know whether the jpa spec snapshots are being deployed >>>>> in the snapshot repo? >>>>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/geronimo/specs/ >>>>> ?? >>>>> >>>>> I am looking for this artifact: >>>>> >>>>> <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> >>>>> <artifactId>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</artifactId> >>>>> <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version> >>>>> >>>>> I can't seem to find it. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> Andrus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>
