Oh, I did not realize it was a req from the incubator pmc. They, putting in the version is defs better than the groupId IMO. Still kinda lame... but gotta play by the rules na?
--jason On 7/24/06, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jason, On 7/24/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The groupId change is good... but you might want to use "4.1- > incubator-SNAPSHOT" for a version id that gives better with maven Good point.. I think this is what servicemix does too. version number processing. Or just call it "4.1-SNAPSHOT" I really > don't see much value putting incubator in there at all. Including "incubator" in the name of the release artifacts in a requirement set by the incubator pmc. Right now we have been putting it in the groupId and also the artifactId of the assembly module. If we move it to the version part we can take it out of the groupId and also the assembly module artifactId. --jason > > > On Jul 24, 2006, at 3:17 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > How would you guys feel if we follow servicemix's lead and switch > > to using > > the "org.apache.activemq" group id and and "incubator-4.1-SNAPSHOT" > > as the > > version number in our maven poms? It something that we will > > eventually need > > to do any ways, so, I say we might as well do it now. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Hiram > > > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com > > -- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
