Hallelujah !!! Cheers Prasad
On 7/28/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds reasonable to disable this test for now. On that note, I'm also starting to lean towards disabling modules/ timer tests for now too. --jason On Jul 28, 2006, at 6:04 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: > Your suspicion about the JDK version became stronger when the same > activation module built successfully on my Linux machine which has jdk > 1.4.2_10. The windows machine on which it failed had jdk 1.5.0_06. > > I think we should exclude this test for now. Then we should fix the > test to account for differences in jdk versions. > > What say you ? > > Cheers > Prasad. > > On 7/27/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> FYI, this was the test that I had commented out before in that >> module... that mysteriously started working. >> >> Maybe it is related to the JDK version? Just a guess though. >> >> --jason >> >> >> On Jul 27, 2006, at 11:51 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote: >> >> > At revision 426188. Clean local repo >> > >> > Test in activation module fails. Anybody know what suddenly changed >> > there ? >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> > ----------- >> > Test set: org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.MailcapTest >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> > --------- >> > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: >> 0.06 >> > sec <<< FAILURE! >> > testTextPlainHandler >> > (org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.MailcapTest) >> > Time elapsed: 0.03 sec <<< FAILURE! >> > junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: >> > expected:<...activation.handlers.TextPlain...> but >> > was:<...mail.handlers.Text...> >> > at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:81) >> > at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:87) >> > at >> > >> org.apache.geronimo.activation.handlers.MailcapTest.testTextPlainHand >> l >> > er(MailcapTest.java:34) >> > >> > >> > Cheers >> > Prasad >> >>
