The new goal was something I started, I should be able to finish it up and try and get it back in today :)
P On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, for examples not using the std JBI packaging, I though that we could have a new goal in the maven plugin to start a servicemix with a given configuration file. That way, all samples would download the needed dependencies via maven, and start servicemix by running something like mvn jbi:embedded which would launch a servicemix configured by a servicemix.xml file in the root dir. The only problem is that examples sometimes need a client which must be compiled and launched ... On 8/4/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm currently in the process of refactoring / documenting the examples > that ship with ServiceMix distribution. > ServiceMix has a large set of bindings, service engines (both standard and > lightweight), but I have the feeling > that we can not put thousands examples in the distribution. > I'd rather go with fewer, better documented examples, which would show > more complex deployments (compared > to a simple file-poller / file-writer example), and have more examples / > use cases on the web site only (with only the servicemix.xml config file > to show how to do something). > > I have began to write 2 new examples using the maven jbi tooling, so we > now have 3 of this kind: > * loan-broker (using servicemix-bpe, servicemix-lwcontainer) need to be > completed with some binding > * bridge (see > http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/creating-a-protocol-bridge.html) (need > to write a jms receiver of some kind > * wsdl-first (using servicemix-http, servicemix-jsr181) > we also have the servicemix-web webapp which demonstrates embedding > servicemix in a web app > and I have just moved to the sandbox the following samples: > * soap-binding (superseeded by wsdl-first) > * http-binding > * jms-binding > * bpel-bpe (rewritten as loan-broker) > * loan-broker (which only use properties so i don' t think it was a good > example) > > Any thoughts ? > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
