On 8/15/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
David,
I am releasing the specs as a 1.1.1 release due to some changes in jacc. Do
you want to include the
changes to JPA there?
For my 2 cents, that would be great!
Thanks,
Aaron
David Blevins wrote:
> I got OpenJPA to run with my JPA code. So we're looking real good.
>
> On Aug 13, 2006, at 8:24 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
>
>> So far, it's just got a TopLink provider, but if people want to copy
>> that to create providers for Cayenne or OpenJPA or whatever, that
>> would be great. It basically just needs to have a customized name and
>> ClassPath, though I'm assuming any provider we integrate with will be
>> compatible with the Geronimo JPA spec JAR (currently
>> org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec/1.0-SNAPSHOT/jar)
>
> OpenJPA and the Geronimo JPA spec jar weren't happy. Our JPA jar had
> some bad signatures and was missing a few exception classes. I fixed
> those and managed to get OpenJPA to compile and run with our JPA jar
> rather than the CDDL version they use.
>
>> If you try to build and run this, you'll be held up by a couple things:
>
> For me its:
> - Still missing the some JNDI stuff Dain is working on (mentioned
> earlier in the thread).
> - Need the plugin goop
>
> But when that is there, this should run for ejbs or servlets in 1.1.1
> and maybe 1.1 (should work).
>
>> My goal is to have a release of this plugin with sufficient user
>> documentation when G 1.1.1 is released. It would be great to have
>> some open source JPA providers for that release too.
>>
>> I also started talking to David B about the JPA work being done in
>> OpenEJB, and I think we're agreed that we probably don't need two such
>> plugins for G 1.1.x, so hopefully we can work toward a unification as
>> we move forward.
>
> I'm sure we can figure something out. I'll give it some more thought
> tomorrow, time for bed now....zzzzZZZZ
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
