On 8/9/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So far there have been no negative reponses, and several PMC +1s
Can we start an official vote and then plan for the removal of m1?
--jason
On Aug 9, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> +1
>
> Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>> I propose we remove the m1 build. It has been broken for several
>> days now and no one has noticed. Here is my vote:
I caution against removing the m1 until the m2 build has been stable
for a period of time. We made this mistake with ActiveMQ and
ServiceMix and wound up having to restore the m1 build while gremlins
were flushed from the m2 build.
I tend to think Jason's proposal is better one. Give it some time to
be tested and get stable.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
Apache Geronimo - http://geronimo.apache.org/
Apache ActiveMQ - http://incubator.apache.org/activemq/
Apache ServiceMix - http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/
Castor - http://castor.org/
