I'm all for TestNG... hopefully now the maven reports are all happy
since its now supported by surefire.
But, the TestSupport classes does not need to be JUnit specific, the
same code will work fine in TestNG... and once we switch over to TNG
fully (if or when that is), all we need to do (optionally) is drop
the extends from TestCase and everything else should be fine.
--jason
On Aug 19, 2006, at 8:49 AM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Jason,
Before going too deeply in to the JUnit space what do you think of
using TestNG. I've used it on a couple of applications and found it
very nice to work with. Its yet another reason to move to JDK 5
though so I'm not sure about timing (although you can use it with
JDK 1.4 I've not done that and I don't like annotations in comments
generally).
TTFN,
-bd-
On Aug 17, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Most likely.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:42 PM, David Jencks wrote:
YAY!!!
Can you make the File ref to ${basedir} work in idea without
setting test properties?
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'd like to add a new module to our build, geronimo-testsupport,
which provides at the moment a single TestSupport class which
sets up logging and some other commonly used bits (like the File
ref to ${basedir}).
And then incrementally I'd like for all of our test classes to
extend from this instead of junit.framework.TestCase.
Any objections?
--jason
