Sure if you want to wait 0-6 months for a response.
-dain
On Aug 21, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Can we go back to the root of the problem which is the distribution
of the schemas? This may have already been put to bed but, can't
we get permission from Sun to distribute these puppies?
Regards,
Alan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Why not publish the src jar in addition to the binary?
-dain
On Aug 21, 2006, at 9:56 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I've thought about this some more and have some major
reservations about this approach.
- The generated code wont have apache headers, so we can't
actually check in into svn. There might be a way to fix this
with a script of some kind.
- More seriously, this will eliminate traceability to the source
schema. Sun has in the past fixed errors in the schema without
changing anything that can be recognized from the generated
source. (I think they changed a date in a comment). This is a
major problem IMNSHO.
So, I think we need to keep the source schemas in svn. One way
to do this would be to move this module into the tck project and
publish the binary jar from there. If we found a way to change
the headers we might be able to publish a source jar too.
So, I'm -0.999 on this proposal at the moment... I think we need
to find a way to get the source schemas into svn.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 19, 2006, at 9:49 AM, David Jencks wrote:
GERONIMO-2332 didn't show up in the list of RTC issues sent out
today, and I don't see the "Begin RTC Review" button.... any ideas?
Anyway, please vote so we can get this taken care of.
thanks
david jencks
On Aug 18, 2006, at 4:15 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've implemented the proposal to not ship any sun schemas or
dtds to avoid licensing questions and to check in the xmlbeans
generated files.
Please vote promptly.
I've provided patches for trunk and branches/1.1. I expect
that the 1.1 patch should work for 1.1.1 also, I'm hoping
someone else will check for me.
Before releasing 1.1.1 including this work we'd have to release
the proposed new specs jar with the generated xmlbeans classes
in it: this would involve changing the version number to 1.0 in
several places.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2332
thanks
david jencks
