Yeah, it sounds better.
On 8/21/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer we don't use a plural for a module or package name, so how
about we call the module xbean-classloader?
-dain
On Aug 20, 2006, at 12:13 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Should the xbean-classloaders module have a package named
> org.apache.xbean.classloaders
> instead of keeping the old one
> org.apache.xbean.server.classloader
>
> It would break compatibility, but if it deserved a new module ...
>
> On 8/20/06, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> > I'm going to take a crack at breaking out the classloading code
>> into a
>> > separate module. Should be simple enough.
>> >
>> > I'll solicit comments when I'm done and we can do an RTC vote
>> > afterwards, if all goes well.
>> >
>> Done, xbean/branches/classloader. Comments anyone?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
