Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Blevins wrote:But the lazy consensus "cut off" you mention is something to think about.That sort of model has been used before successfully. IIRC, it was as part of the 'controversial issues are RTC' part of CTR. In other words, rather than committing something that might be controversial (which shouldn't be done under pretty much any circumstances), it would be posted as a patch for people to examine and check out, with a comment of 'if no-one - -1s this in 72 hours I'll commit it.' An acceptable middle ground procedure. This seems like a nice RTC/CTR compromise to me. Regards, Alan |
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review? Alan Cabrera
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review? David Blevins
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review? Jacek Laskowski
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Review? Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-Revie... Jacek Laskowski
- Re: Returning to Commit-Then-... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Returning to Commit-T... Aaron Mulder
- Re: Returning to Comm... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Returning to Comm... Aaron Mulder
- Re: Returning to Comm... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Returning to Commit-T... Rodent of Unusual Size