The artifacts are already downloadable from the m2 repository.
For example, the wsdl-first SA is available at
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/samples/wsdl-first/wsdl-first-sa/3.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/wsdl-first-sa-3.0-incubating-20060823.104511-6.zip

I guess we could put in the README.txt an alternative way to deploy the
samples by downloading manually the SA
and copy it along with the needed components to the deploy/install dir.

Jeppe, do you think it would help ?

On 8/24/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

We could use maven to automatically generate some Ant build files for
folks who are maven averse. Though there is such rich tooling support
now in Maven for working with JBI (e.g. creating JBI archetypes,
creating JBI deployment units) so anyone working with ServiceMix
should try to use Maven as the build/deploy tool (unless using the
Eclipse tooling which is using Maven internally anyway ;-).

Maybe if the examples were just downloadable as pre-built artifacts
you'd not have to use Maven to run the examples, you could just drop
them into a running server?


On 8/24/06, Jeppe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems a bit contrived to have to use maven to build the examples.
Maven
> might be used to build the release, but it seems strange that the
> distribution should be dependent on Maven. With Maven there is alot of
> "magic" going on in the background which doesn't add to the clarity of
the
> examples and facilitates a low threashold of entry into servicemix.
>
> This was not the case in M2, but has changed sometimes after. Or maybe
it's
> just this way when building the SNAPSHOT package?
>
> I believe that the examples are usually the entry point for beginner
(like
> mysellf) in getting to grips with a new platform.
>
> What is the reason for this? Any possibilities to revert this course?
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Why-do-examples-need-maven-to-run-tf2157824.html#a5961238
> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
>
>


--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/




--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet

Reply via email to