gnodet wrote: > > I do not see any reasons. > I have tested the samples and they work. > Could you paste the content of your SU and the console log ? > > On 8/31/06, jsolderitsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> jsolderitsch wrote: >> > >> >> I really need some advice here. >> >> I saw in another post that jetty is supposed to start automatically if >> you >> use an http su. >> >> My service assembly DOES include such an su. >> >> With 3.0M2, deploying my sa causes jetty to start as expected. >> >> With the last 3 days snapshots, this is NOT the case. A deployment that >> works just fine with 3.0M2 now fails to work. >> >> I learned that you can force jetty to start with the proper servicemix >> configuration entry. >> >> But I need an example of the syntax I need to add to servicemix.xml or >> servicemix.conf to make this happen. >> >> Any reason why the startup behavior with the snapshots is different than >> the >> last milestone? >> >> Jim >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Is-jetty-broken-in-latest-snapshots--tf2191258.html#a6086662 >> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com. >> >> > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > >
I am sending the xbean and jbi xml files via private email. I hope they can suggest what my problem could be? There is a change from 3.0M2 that is rather severe. Could this be a platform issue -- are you using Windows XP to test this? I am not using Windows here. Jim -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-jetty-broken-in-latest-snapshots--tf2191258.html#a6086959 Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
