feel the power!
;-|
On Sep 4, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Your votes count as much as my votes count at the moment :-P
--jason
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hey Jason,
Yep, time lag is an issue. My votes don't even count, I'm just
trying to help get/keep the ball rolling on these patches.
I won't post any new patches cause then it might appear that I'm
signing up for continuos rediff duty :-)
TTFN,
-bd-
On Sep 4, 2006, at 2:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Sep 4, 2006, at 1:09 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
From your comments I don't think you fixed the configs/client/
pom.xml and/or you might have had something stale in your
assembly.
As I mentioned, I just re-tested the patch and there were no
errors.
I'll retest, is it worth posting a new patch? Would make it
slightly easier for others to test the patch.
Eh... if more hunks failed I might... but the longer we wait to
apply the more chances that more hunks will fail... and so I
don't want to sign up to continuously rediff.
:-\
From the stack you posted, it does not look like you updated
ActiveMQManagerGBean as I mentioned was the fix for this
exception ( its the comment right before your stack :-P )
Dooh! how about a new patch that includes the NPE fix. I'd be
glad to post it if you think its worth it. I think this one is
definitely worth it cause it makes it simply patch, rebuild,
test instead of having to manually edit stuff.
Eh... if you feel like it... though that just means that I gotta
reverify it. :-\
Blah, this should just get committed. The lag from patch to
verify to commit is too much, its just causing more overhead.
If this keeps up I may go back to a branch in the sandbox.
--jason
