On Sep 12, 2006, at 4:26 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Sorry if I wasn't clear. My vote is for 3 without qualifications. Was simply adding (unsuccessfully) that my proposal didn't make it into the list of options.
I didn't mean to come across too strongly. I was noticing on this vote and others that people are +1 ing with comments. So far its not an issue but I think this leaves room for confusion later on. Thanks
Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
