Jacek Laskowski wrote: > On 9/14/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why not use ActiveMQ for communication and take advantage of its >> broker network for failover? > > I'd be better off leaving answering the question to Jeff, but here's > my take on Jeff's proposal that may answer your question. > > AFAIUI, Jeff proposes a solution that doesn't need to be complicated > in its first days of living. Since, everybody knows how sockets work > the only issue is to combine separated Geronimo instance to a one > clustered environment. The real value of the proposal is that it's > that simple. A client may eventually use a better communication means > like AMQ by pluggable strategies (as Jeff pointed out), but it would > require more knowledge for the starters (like me) to understand and > help developing it. > > I like the idea of doing it with the KISS principle in mind (thanks > Dain). Once the master-slave and client-master communications are done > (a 2/3th-closed triangle) the rest would be left to these magical > pluggable solutions.
Perfectly said...you said it better than me ;-) > > Jacek >
