On Sep 19, 2006, at 5:07 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Oops, I missed replying.
For me,
1- cert
2- release date
3- feature set
4- name
I could probably be talked out of the release date priority if we
are producing weekly certifiable builds and our build/tck process
is working really smoothly.
I'm really really really worried about the amount of development on
trunk that has not had the tck run against it.
That pretty much echos my thoughts exactly.
-David
thanks
david jencks
On Sep 19, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I only got a few responses, but we the results were almost unanimous
so I'm going to take this as a sign that most people agree with what
was already posted. If you do disagree with the poll results, please
speak up.
RESULTS:
[1] Certification
[2] Feature Set
[3] Release Date
[4] Release Name
Certification is a requirement and timeline will be pushed to achieve
a desired feature set and no one seems to care what the release are
named :)
Based on this feed back, I will start another thread where we can
discuss the feature requirements for the next release. Again if you
disagree, please jump in now.
Thanks for the feed back,
-dain
On 9/8/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In an attempt to quantify our expectation about the next release
from
trunk, please rank the following items in importance to you:
[ ] Release Date
[ ] Feature Set
[ ] Release Name
[ ] Certification
