Cool :) I missed them, I was looking at the 4.0.2 tag ..
On 10/5/06, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/5/06, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about adding an xbean annotation on > the ActiveMQConnectionFactory ? This is > a commonly used object and it would > benefit from an xbean based syntax imho. Good idea - though I'd added them to the connection factory implementations in the spring package - which adds some spring-aware helpers (like using the bean name in the generated JMS clientID - so if you use different IDs in your spring files, you'll get more helpful clientIDs when debugging). I was working with a customer a little while back who had lots of spring configuration files and they found it helpful to name the JMS clients so they could easily see what app was connecting etc. -- James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet
