For the simple expressions we are using I don't think it matters...
and the jexl bits are already coded... once this is committed, if you
guys still want ognl we can look at replacing it. But right now I
don't care enough to change it.
--jason
On Oct 5, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
40k is nothing so I don't think that should be the deciding factor.
I personally think we should go with ognl on rep alone. I hear
nothing but bad things about jexl and only praise for ognl.
-dain
On Oct 5, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
ognl-2.6.9.jar is 164k compared to 129k for commons-jexl... so I'm
inclined to use jexl for now based on its size and relative
simplicity.
--jason
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:45 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
btw.. ongl might also be a good canidate to use as an expression
language.
On 10/4/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I cleaned up my quick POC into a patch suitable to be applied to
trunk:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2463
Please review. If there are no objections I will apply this
over the
weekend.
Thanks,
--jason
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
