Sorry, should have included this important detail: If you start the brokers in the opposite order, everything works correctly. I.e.:
1) Start broker B 2) Start broker A 3) start consumer C against broker A, on FOO 4) start publisher P against broker B, on FOO yaussy wrote: > > Thought I'd throw this out there, even though I haven't tested it > completely. But, I just ran into a problem this morning like the > following (using the ProducerTool and ConsumerTool from the distribution): > > 1) Start broker A (has a network connection to broker B) > 2) Start broker B (has a network connection to broker A) > 3) start consumer C against broker A, on FOO > 4) start publisher P against broker B, on FOO > > Messages do not flow to consumer C. In the broker B log, there's no > indication it got any subscriptions from broker A. > > If you need more detail, such as XML (pretty stock settings, though), let > me know. > > > Hiram Chirino wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> Thanks for taking the time to check the release. Vote passes with 7 >> +1's . We just need to get the incubator PMC to now approve the >> release. >> >> +1 Votes: >> Hiram Chirino >> James Strachan >> Rob Davies >> Guillaume Nodet >> Brian McCallister >> Alan D. Cabrera >> Aaron Mulder >> >> No +/- 0 or -1's >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Hiram >> >> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE-RESULT--Release-Apache-ActiveMQ-4.0.2-%28RC-4%29-tf2370024.html#a6678769 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
