Granted 2m seems a bit hefty though... --jason
On Oct 7, 2006, at 3:42 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Well for starters, there's neither an attributes.xml nor an attributes.xsd... :) But the answers I think are that when we first did it it was pretty simple and XMLBeans seemed kind of heavyweight, and there was an ongoing debate about whether we'd actually want to stick with XMLBeans for the other stuff anyway. Also, config.xml has to be loaded super-early in the boot process and I'm not sure that XMLBeans is that high in the class loader hierarchy presently. Since it's a couple of MB it might be nice if it wasn't strictly required in order to run anything at all. Thanks, Aaron On 10/7/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Anyone know why we are not using xmlbeans to handle attributes.xml processing (config.xml) ? --jason
