Hi Anita,
I don’t think this would work since there is no guarantee that a
“complete list of all valid j2eeTypes” will be created. Your suggestion
might result to an incomplete list of j2eeTypes. I designed the JMX tree
to list all the possible j2eeTypes whether there is one available or
not. IMO this is a better design because it gives you an idea of what
other j2eeTypes are available. Again AFAIK there is no way of getting
this complete list using our existing api hence I decided to hardcode
the list in the jsp. Obviously the advantage here is faster loading of
the page and it’s easy to update the list without recompiling any java
files. The disadvantage of course is updating the jsp file every time
the list changes (most likely only for G specific j2eeTypes and I’m not
sure if this is likely to happen) vs. getting the complete list from the
server (assuming it’s possible or it’s available) and rendering the tree
to display the list.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
Chris,
Assuming that the listGBeans method can not be qureied to return such
a list, can't we create a list of _distinct_ j2eeTypes by processing
the list of all MBeans? Would such a list work for you?
Thanks
Anita
----- Original Message ----
From: Christopher M. Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 6, 2006 12:18:49 PM
Subject: Re: JMX Viewer
Anita,
This is not a requirement of Dojo. AFAIK there is no way of getting a
list of all the j2eeTypes (standard j2ee and G specific) using any
Kernel api. I got the list by looking at G source and combining it with
the different types returned when calling Kernel.listGBeans(). If you
know a solution for this then I'm more than willing to try it out.
Best wishes,
chris
anita kulshreshtha wrote:
> Chris,
> I was going through the code (JMXServer.jsp). I see that all the
> MBean names are hardcoded. Is this something that is required by dojo?
> Ideally, when the JMXViewer is invoked for the first time the MBean
> names should be generated using kernel.listGBeans. Am I missing
something?
>
> Thanks
> Anita
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 10:25:19 AM
> Subject: Re: JMX Viewer
>
> .........................................
>
>
