We have been through 4 RCs so far. I thought that one was going to be the last. maybe in 1 or 2 more weeks.
On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When is 4.0.2 gonna go final? Docs suggest its still being voted upon. --jason On Oct 13, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote: > Yeah.. there was a small bug in the 4.0.1 code that causes it to not > negotiate properly with future versions of the protocol. > This bug has been fixed in the 4.0.2 version. And 4.0.2 should be > able to > connect to 4.0.1 and 4.1 versions of the broker just fine. > > If this is not the case, let me know! > > On 10/13/06, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hey, just curious if there is a plan (or maybe it already exists) to >> provide support for interoperability between AMQ versions? I ask, >> because I recently started working on GBuild again, which uses AMQ... >> I setup a 4.0.1 broker, but my clients were using the 4.1-incubator* >> and 4.0.1 broker was puking out CNFE exceptions: >> >> <snip> >> Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:52264" >> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid version: 2, could not >> load org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory >> at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion >> (OpenWireFormat.java:329) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.renegociatWireFormat >> (OpenWireFormat.java:569) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.WireFormatNegotiator.onCommand >> (WireFormatNegotiator.java:100) >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityMonitor.onCommand >> (InactivityMonitor.java:122) >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume >> (TransportSupport.java:87) >> at org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run >> (TcpTransport.java:143) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) >> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: >> org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.MarshallerFactory >> at org.apache.activemq.util.ClassLoading.loadClass >> (ClassLoading.java:104) >> at org.apache.activemq.openwire.OpenWireFormat.setVersion >> (OpenWireFormat.java:327) >> ... 6 more >> </snip> >> >> I think I am probably going to just embed a broker in each GBuild >> node and use network connectors from the slaves back to the master >> node for connectivity so that its easier to use the m2 deps from 4.1- >> incubator* to keep things in sync (among other reasons). >> >> * * * >> >> But, just wondering if there was a plan for broader interop? >> >> --jason >> > > > > -- > Regards, > Hiram > > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
-- Regards, Hiram Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
