On 11/6/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Paul McMahan wrote: > For what its worth I examined the eclipse plugin and was +1 except for > the copyright headers. I had assumed that we would need to respin the > binaries after updating the copyright headers and that would result in > a follow-on vote. I assumed the same... As a group, seems we need to try, as a group, to be a bit clearer/explicit about our assumptions...
Agreed. In hindsight I think it would have been more clear to vote -1. But at the time I wasn't sure if the copyright update was actually required and if so whether or not a respin was necessary since the src is only available via svn. Looks like 'yes' and 'yes' are the answers to my (far too implicit) questions :-) Best wishes, Paul
