-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 David Jencks wrote: > > I think this is a bad idea: it breaks the model that anything in > server/** is a complete server and provides no advantage I can see to > working in the sandbox. I am strongly against this.
One advantage is that it formalises the effort so it's no longer people playing in the sandbox, but a legitimate shared initiative. If the 'server/** is only complete servers' model is, in fact, generally accepted, I don't see that it also means 'is only complete WORKING servers.' But if that model obtains and the EE 5 work proposed doesn't constitute a 'complete server,' then putting the work there probably doesn't make sense. But it's also reasonable for it to come out of the sandbox if people want to pursue it as more than a toy. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBRVC6QJrNPMCpn3XdAQKQkQP/ev4sMFFcAo1K7NJOaCCtx+NIxWU4ZGvn BiPBzhiCHNZWov26/Z/PM2uhEjGyJT/aSuh4g6NBnHhHhzQtiOm/dfkYFmZTNOk9 2W/QprERe3eFd4X9AstZyZZrTT6QMGYhZRV/dCJZpwduVYLImcxYqMDfQoH92+mG 9zdFu+c6L6I= =4HgX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
