| +1 I think this would be the right approach. Having trunk become 2.0 would make a strong statement to the community and our users toward our drive for JEE 5 certification. Also it will greatly simplify our development having a full JEE 5 stream that everyone is focused working on stabilizing rather then a set of scattered sparse trees as people are already struggling with building and trying to work on JEE5. On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
-sachin |
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Dain Sundstrom
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Jacek Laskowski
- Re: Java EE 5.0 David Jencks
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Joe Bohn
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Matt Hogstrom
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Kevan Miller
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Matt Hogstrom
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Joe Bohn
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Sachin Patel
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Kevan Miller
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Matt Hogstrom
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Prasad Kashyap
- Re: Java EE 5.0 David Jencks
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Matt Hogstrom
- Re: Java EE 5.0 David Jencks
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Guillaume Nodet
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Joe Bohn
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Paul McMahan
- Re: Java EE 5.0 Joe Bohn
