On Nov 29, 2006, at 11:16 AM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Hi David,
I haven't seriously tried the new test jars after your added the
getName(). It failed once but I didn't give it a serious thought since
I could have been running 2.2-SNAPSHOT. I realized much later that
there is now a 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
I put it in both 2.2 and 2.3 and published new jars of each.
Thanks for putting this in. I shall give it a shot soon.
Cool. Let me know if there's more I can do.
-David
Cheers
Prasad.
On 11/29/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 27, 2006, at 3:45 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 2:16 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/06, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> This looks like a problem with surefire. These test classes run
>>> fine
>>> in the released version of surefire, but looks like something
broke
>>> in the snapshot version you're using. It's trying to call
getName()
>>> on instances of junit.framework.Test and that interface does not
>>> have
>>> getName(). Seems they've decided to code in the assumption
that all
>>> tests are subclasses of the TestCase abstract class. They
need to
>>> unbreak surefire.
>>>
>
> I added a getName() method and published new binaries. It may help
> you get farther.
>
Prasad, you getting any farther on this? Did the added getName()
method do the trick?
-David
