On Dec 7, 2006, at 7:57 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 6, 2006, at 8:11 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I'm not sure who I've talked to about this or where but I think
really really strongly that we should include the major version
number of the projects we integrate in our artifactIds relating to
those external projects.
A couple people have pointed out that something like jetty_6 or
geronimo-jetty6-builder is more consistent with our spec naming
than jetty6 or geronimo-jetty6-naming.
I don't really care about that, although I think the shorter
tomcat6 is perfectly clear and easier to type.
Other stuff:
axis >> axis1
cxf >> cxf1
openjpa >> openjpa1
I think this will really reduce confusion about what is running in
a server.
So, I'd like the tomcat modules to be renamed geronimo-tomcat6,
geronimo-tomcat6-builder, tomcat6, tomcat6-deployer.
Can we discuss and settle this soon?
Not sure I feel quite as strongly as you.. but I'm giving it a
try... ;-)
So, any module written explicitly for an external project (i.e. non-
Geronimo) would have the external project's major version number
encoded in it's name? But not minor number?
So, activemq, wadi, would be added to your above list? Heh. How
about geronimo-jetty-clustering-wadi? ;-) geronimo-jetty5-
clustering-wadi2?
yup
thanks
david jencks
--kevan
