No problem.. It was late at night. My commit failed because something was not up-to-date. So I did svn update without checking the commit messages. The tomcat and tomcat-builder modules were gone! We must remember that everyone does not have access to commit messages.
Thanks Anita --- Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My apologies, I had thought that the discussion on dev plus mail from > scm would be sufficient notification but I could have also sent a > heads-up notice. I also didn't realize svn could lose your local > changes from an update -- usually it automatically merges them or > marks a conflict and saves your files. I hope there is a way to > recover your lost changes. > > Best wishes, > Paul > > On 12/11/06, anita kulshreshtha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be nice if before renaming/moving directories, a note > > announcing the change could be sent to the list. This will give > people > > a chance to rename their local copies and avoid getting them wiped > out > > by an svn update. > > > > Thanks > > Anita > > > > --- Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > FYI -- the following artifactIds are now renamed to use > "tomcat6". > > > org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6 > > > org.apache.geronimo.configs/tomcat6-deployer > > > org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-tomcat6 > > > org.apache.geronimo.modules/geronimo-tomcat6-builder > > > org.apache.geronimo.assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-jee5 > > > org.apache.geronimo.assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-minimal > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > On 12/6/06, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm not sure who I've talked to about this or where but I think > > > > really really strongly that we should include the major version > > > > number of the projects we integrate in our artifactIds relating > to > > > > those external projects. > > > > > > > > A couple people have pointed out that something like jetty_6 or > > > > geronimo-jetty6-builder is more consistent with our spec naming > > > than > > > > jetty6 or geronimo-jetty6-naming. > > > > I don't really care about that, although I think the shorter > > > tomcat6 > > > > is perfectly clear and easier to type. > > > > > > > > Other stuff: > > > > axis >> axis1 > > > > cxf >> cxf1 > > > > openjpa >> openjpa1 > > > > > > > > I think this will really reduce confusion about what is running > in > > > a > > > > server. > > > > > > > > So, I'd like the tomcat modules to be renamed geronimo-tomcat6, > > > > geronimo-tomcat6-builder, tomcat6, tomcat6-deployer. > > > > > > > > Can we discuss and settle this soon? > > > > > > > > thanks > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > > > ps. I'm planning to remove the jetty[5] stuff from trunk soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. > > http://new.mail.yahoo.com > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com
