yes, I tried two things:
1. broker is not running
2. kill the broker while producer is sending message.
exception was caught in try{}catch() in run block, but not onException()
On 12/13/06, Bish, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Connection object doesn't seems to throw exceptions.
>
> my code looks like this:
>
> class myProducer : public ExceptionListener,
> public Runnable {
> ....
>
> // Create a Connection
> connection = connectionFactory->createConnection();
> connection->setExceptionListener(this);
> connection->start();
> ...
>
> virtual void onException( const CMSException& ex ) {
> printf("JMS Exception occured. reconnect?.\n");
> ex.printStackTrace();
> }
>
> ...
>
> I don't get anything from onException().
Are you doing anything that might trigger an exception?
>
> How do I get it to work? Please help.
>
> Thanks
> On 12/12/06, Timothy Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > too bad.
> > > any work-around? can we catch some exception somewhere and open up
> > another
> > > connection to failover broker?
> > > My producer has to be integrated into cpp code.
> > >
> >
> > Just like in Java, you can set an ExceptionListener on the
Connection
> > Object, chances are if that gets called its time to reconnect.
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > On 12/12/06, Timothy Bish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: amq user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4:58 PM
> > > > > To: activemq-dev
> > > > > Subject: activemq-cpp failover?
> > > > > Importance: High
> > > > >
> > > > > Does activemq-cpp support failover?
> > > > > I got this:
> > > > >
> > > > > ActiveMQConnectionFactory::createConnection - unknown
transport
> > > factory
> > > > > FILE: activemq/core/ActiveMQConnectionFactory.cpp,
LINE:
> 124
> > > > > FILE: activemq/core/ActiveMQConnectionFactory.cpp,
LINE:
> 179
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Failover is not currently supported and is not currently
planned,
> the
> > > > architecture would support extension of the transport layer to
> support
> > > it.
> > > >
> > > > > If not, will it be supported in the near future?
> > > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
