I assume it was intended to distribute the load of managing the
specs. I don't see that working too well though...
--jason
On Dec 28, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:26 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
On Dec 22, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I don't get it... why do we need an adopt a spec program? I'm
not really sure what it is... but it doesn't really sound good. :-\
--jason
It was a suggestion on how to parcel them out...kind of like adopt
a highway program :)
What problem are we trying to solve by instituting the adopt a spec
program?
Regards,
Alan
