I agree, that this whole specs directory layout and handling is a pain for any people/groups outside of the core Geronimo developers to follow.
-Donald Jason Dillon wrote:
Why were these deleted? This is soo retarded IMO...If we are going to be using the specs/trunk as a some transient place for specs to live, then it should be completely removed, and each spec should get its own trunk/branches/tags and be treated like a normal project.Moving stuff in and out of trunk on some ethereal whim is a horrible plan. --jason On Jan 4, 2007, at 8:51 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Author: adc Date: Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007 New Revision: 492633 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=492633 Log: GERONIMO-2692 Removed missing modules Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml Modified: geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xmlURL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml?view=diff&rev=492633&r1=492632&r2=492633 ==============================================================================--- geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml (original) +++ geronimo/specs/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jan 4 08:51:02 2007 @@ -120,13 +120,10 @@ </activation> <modules> - <module>geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec</module> <module>geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec</module> <module>geronimo-el_1.0_spec</module> - <module>geronimo-interceptor_3.0_spec</module> <module>geronimo-j2ee-management_1.1_spec</module> <module>geronimo-jacc_1.1_spec</module> - <module>geronimo-jpa_3.0_spec</module> <module>geronimo-jsp_2.1_spec</module> <module>geronimo-ws-metadata_2.0_spec</module> </modules>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
