Skip to site navigation (Press enter)
2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Jason Dillon
Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:22:03 -0800
Do we need to include qname anymore? Looks like that is part of se 5
now...
Anyone know?
--jason
Previous message
View by thread
View by date
Next message
2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Jason Dillon
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Davanum Srinivas
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Jason Dillon
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Kevan Miller
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Dain Sundstrom
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Vamsavardhana Reddy
Re: 2.0 & geronimo-qname_1.1_spec
Matt Hogstrom
Reply via email to
Search the site
The Mail Archive home
dev - all messages
dev - about the list
Expand
Previous message
Next message