On Jan 11, 2007, at 5:51 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Do you (or anyone else) know why we have a geronimo-transaction and
geronimo-transaction-jta11 module?
Why do we need 2 modules for this?
We don't anymore, but we did/do for 1.2.x as we can't certify on J2EE
1.4 with the jta 1.1 library in the path.
-David
--jason
On Jan 11, 2007, at 8:34 PM, David Blevins wrote:
On Jan 11, 2007, at 4:55 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Should we be using the jta 1.1 spec?
Everywhere in server/trunk is configured to use 1.0.1B right
now. It appears that when using 1.1 the server will compile and
startup fine... though none of that really uses transactions.
Anyone know if any problems will show up if we switch to the JTA
1.1 spec? Or maybe there is a little work (hopefully not a lot)
that needs to be done in G to sync up the codebase for 1.1?
Should be fine. There's just an additional interface in JTA 1.1.
-David
