At this point, the vote for 1.1 has already gone to the incubator PMC, so unfortunately it's to late to get it into 1.1.
Why don't you capture that in an issue targeted for 2.0 http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP ... if there are enough issues, we may cut an patched 1.1.1 release before going to 2.0. Regards, Nate On 1/18/07, Motl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Why isn't actviemq-cpp compiled with '-W -Wall' options? It's very useful, because default warning level for gcc is quite low. The problem is that while compiling code that uses cms/* headers with -W -Wall, number of warnings appears like that: ./activemq/exceptions/ActiveMQException.h: In copy constructor `activemq::exceptions::ActiveMQException::ActiveMQException(const activemq::exceptions::ActiveMQException&)': ./activemq/exceptions/ActiveMQException.h:55: warning: base class `class cms::CMSException' should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor and it's quite annoying. Could it be fixed in 1.1 release - there is no big work here. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/activemq-cpp-compilation-warnings-tf3033440.html#a8428456 Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
