JBI Component Framework (no plural) sounds fine to me.

We need to document servicemix-common, which is our framework for
building standard JBI components. But at the same time, servicemix-common
does not sounds like a very good name.  What about "JBI Components
Framework" ?
I'm not talking about changing the code, nor the jar, just to do a bit more advertising on the the web site about it ...


--
Terry Cox
Meta-Concepts Ltd

Reply via email to