I would just add a new link on the nav for J2G... and when/if we get
an IDEA plugin, then add that as a separate link too. I'd also give
each of them their own JIRA project too. I'm okay with the svn sub-
tree for devtools/.... just slightly annoyed that we refer to the
eclipse plugin as "devtools", when its really the "eclipse plugin".
Its minor... but I'm anal about structure and naming :-P
--jason
On Mar 6, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Paul McMahan wrote:
As long as there is only the eclipse plugin in the devtools project I
agree that it would be clearer to just call it "eclipse plugin" from
the main page. The J2G tooling that was recently contributed was
implemented as a collection of eclipse plugins, so I think the naming
you propose will still work OK if/when it gets added to that page.
Best wishes,
Paul
On 3/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree its a development tool... but its seems really odd that we
don't just call this "eclipse-plugin"... which seems to be the normal
way other projects refer to their eclipse integration.
For example, on the main page under sub-projects... I think the link
should be "Eclipse Plugin" and that most users will kind of expect to
see that instead of "Development Tools", which happens to be a page
all about the "Eclipse Plugin" anyways.
--jason
