Anyways... I wasn't referring to the devtools/site.xml bits, though
that is another area where "devtools" means "eclipse-plugin". Should
eventually be tidy'd up, but the thing I wanted to chagne more was
the html pages for the site.
--jason
On Mar 7, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
If the URL changes for the site.xml changes it will break things
from an update manager perspective. The URL to the eclipse related
files need to stay the same. Please do not move these.
-sachin
On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
This is more a organizational kind of question.
How should we maintain the eclipse-plugin specific content (other
than eclipse-plugin.html that could be in the root dir).
There is currently a devtools directory that contains some eclipse-
plugin related files. Should we create a new sub-dir under
devtools for each subproject and move the content there?
Cheers!
Hernan
Sachin Patel wrote:
Ok, I see how this could clarrify things. I don't have a problem
with this.
-sachin
On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Primarily its the link on the site (in the side-nav) and the
name of the page which is linked to, though I have read emails
in the past too which talk about "devtools" when they meant
"eclipse-plugin". Anyways, when we get more devtools sub-
projects I think each should have their own page and a separate
link... and their own JIRA. I don't like the umbrella page.
For example, I'd like to see:
------------------------------
| Development Tools |
------------------------------
| Eclipse Plugin | <--- links to eclipse-plugin.html
| Netbeans Plugin | <--- links to netbeans-plugin.html
| ...
(sorry evil ascii art)
the NB thing is an example, since AFAIK we don't have one of
those yet.
--jason
On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:44 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
I don't understand. What is currently named devtools besides
the link on the site? I favor what we have currently, but if
you feel strongly about this, I will not object any changes you
make.
-sachin
On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 3/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
I guess the thing I don't really like right now... is that we
refer
to the "eclipse-plugin" as "devtools" interchangeably. I
believe
that should change... and I think the way to make that change
is to
start renaming stuff that was previously "devtools" (which
was solely
for eclipse tooling support) to "eclipse-plugin".
I second that.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl