Anyways... I wasn't referring to the devtools/site.xml bits, though that is another area where "devtools" means "eclipse-plugin". Should eventually be tidy'd up, but the thing I wanted to chagne more was the html pages for the site.

--jason


On Mar 7, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:

If the URL changes for the site.xml changes it will break things from an update manager perspective. The URL to the eclipse related files need to stay the same. Please do not move these.

-sachin


On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:21 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:

This is more a organizational kind of question.
How should we maintain the eclipse-plugin specific content (other than eclipse-plugin.html that could be in the root dir). There is currently a devtools directory that contains some eclipse- plugin related files. Should we create a new sub-dir under devtools for each subproject and move the content there?

Cheers!
Hernan

Sachin Patel wrote:
Ok, I see how this could clarrify things. I don't have a problem with this.
-sachin
On Mar 7, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Primarily its the link on the site (in the side-nav) and the name of the page which is linked to, though I have read emails in the past too which talk about "devtools" when they meant "eclipse-plugin". Anyways, when we get more devtools sub- projects I think each should have their own page and a separate link... and their own JIRA. I don't like the umbrella page.

For example, I'd like to see:

------------------------------
| Development Tools |
------------------------------
| Eclipse Plugin          | <--- links to eclipse-plugin.html
| Netbeans Plugin      | <--- links to netbeans-plugin.html
| ...

(sorry evil ascii art)

the NB thing is an example, since AFAIK we don't have one of those yet.

--jason


On Mar 7, 2007, at 5:44 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:

I don't understand. What is currently named devtools besides the link on the site? I favor what we have currently, but if you feel strongly about this, I will not object any changes you make.

-sachin


On Mar 6, 2007, at 5:38 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:

On 3/6/07, Jason Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:

I guess the thing I don't really like right now... is that we refer to the "eclipse-plugin" as "devtools" interchangeably. I believe that should change... and I think the way to make that change is to start renaming stuff that was previously "devtools" (which was solely
for eclipse tooling support) to "eclipse-plugin".

I second that.

Jacek

--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl




Reply via email to