If you don't use transactions somehow, there will always
be some points of failures in the system. There is no
way to work around that.
The JMS flow could use transactions / acknoweldgements, but:
* this is not the case actually
* such a mechanism would not sure the reliability if you work with a
database, jms BC, etc ...
the only way here is to use XA transactions.
These features are provided by the JCA flow.
If you are interested in improving the jms flow, you're more than welcome.
On 3/9/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hm,
I'm a little bit confused. An enhancement? So if ServiceMix crashes and I
restart it, it could happen that there are some messages lost? (in the
case
I don't use JCA)
greets Goldi
gnodet wrote:
>
> Well, this is not a problem, this is an enhancement.
> No one has worked on it. FYI, you can also use the
> JCA flow which is transactional, so you can not loose
> any messages.
>
> On 3/9/07, goldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>>
>> in this post:
>>
>>
>>
http://www.nabble.com/Improving-reliability-of-servicemix-jms-t2158845s12049.html#a5964588
>>
>> about the problem of loosing messages was spoken. Has this problem been
>> solved.
>>
>>
>> greets Goldi
>>
>> ps: Excuse my sometimes bad english, I'm german.:-)
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>>
http://www.nabble.com/Message-Lost-Problem%21-tf3375866s12049.html#a9394966
>> Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Message-Lost-Problem%21-tf3375866s12049.html#a9395680
Sent from the ServiceMix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
