Retrotranslator is relatively new and we would only be doubling our
testing and it's more stuff to check when we make release
distributions. Also, how would our retro jars fit into the maven
repository scheme of things?
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 21, 2007, at 10:27 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
Why are you both reluctant to publish retrotranslated jars ?
On 3/21/07, Alan D. Cabrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 (not a veto but a cancelable vote) on publishing retro-jars.
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 21, 2007, at 9:55 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> +1 to 1.5 only
> +0 to publishing retro-jars
>
> david jencks
>
> On Mar 20, 2007, at 11:16 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> Looks like xbean-naming is still compiling for 1.4. Is there any
>> specific reason for this? Can we switch all of xbean to compile
>> for 1.5... and if you need 1.4 compat, then use the
>> retrotranslator-maven-plugin's translate-project goal to make
>> jdk14 artifacts?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>>
>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 5:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> geronimo-naming jar
>>>
>>> I think you'll find you need to update xbean-naming.
>>>
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>> On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:03 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>>>
>>>> The server/trunk build is picking this up in configs/rmi-
>>>> naming... but from where?
>>>>
>>>> Need to update this to use java.util.concurrent... its using
>>>> backport-concurrent-util at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> --jason
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
