This change has completely broken the ability to run any of the TCK
interoperability tests.
Rick
Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
--- Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And how does the portOffset relate to this? If you start with 1098,
isn't the next server instance going to use 1099 and the next one
1100?
If so, why not start with 1099 and let the next one use 1100 and
then
1101?
It's not clear to me either why the RMI port default needs to be
changed.... Do we not want one RMI registry to be shared by all
server
instances?
The portoffset should be chosen such that there are no port
conflicts. Which will rule out portOffset=1. Usually portOffsets are
chosen 100, 200,.. or 1000, 2000, etc. For current port assignments
10,20,30... should also work. I have tested with 10.
Thanks
Anita
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367
