Jason Dillon wrote:
Um... why?
That mens for each release we have a duplicate image? That is crazy
not really, wasn't your point to have a unique image for each release page?
maybe I didn't understand
man. Thats like saying that each page has the banner image attached to
it, though admittedly that is much worse, but its along the same lines
as what you are suggesting.
right, there is no point in copying the very same image over and over again, so
there is clearly a misunderstanding here.
If we are going to use just one image (independent of the Geronimo version) on
each release page then we definitively point to the same spot where we have the
banners and logos on the repo.
However, if we want to have for each release page a new Geronimo box with a
matching version number, then we should to attach each of those images to the
corresponding release page. This is the approach I thought we were talking
about. If we go this way then we need to come up with a kind of standard way to
create that image, today we are missing 1.0 and 1.1.1.
Cheers!
Hernan
If you recall I originally setup this image to pull from a URL and not
from an attachment... and I think it should make its way back to that.
--jason
On May 2, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
I think we should be consistent in the way we manage the attachments
with confluence. I rather have them attached to corresponding release
page. There are not that many to copy over anyway.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
We should just add these to the static files we put into the site and
use an http link here. Especially if we are going to have
per-release pages, we don't want to duplicate those images over and
over.
Should just svn cp them from site/trunk/art into
site/trunk/docs/images...
--jason
On May 2, 2007, at 6:12 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
yeah, that is the autoexported version, the one on confluence (the
source!?) looks fine. The autoexport plugin doesn't see attachment
updates so those files need to be deleted manually
I already opened a JIRA (INFRA-1226) to remove that file so I can
export manually the space and finally get that image updated.
Cheers!
Hernan
Jason Dillon wrote:
Hey, I just noticed that the box has some weird looking border on
the top+left... any idea where that came from?
--jason
On May 1, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Let's do it!
I'll start moving some pages around. Do we have a "Geronimo Box"
without any specific version?
(http://geronimo.apache.org/downloads.data/geronimo-box-1.1-small.jpg)
Cheers!
Hernan
Sachin Patel wrote:
+1.
-sachin
On May 1, 2007, at 4:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
I'd still like to see things organized in the same way that
AcitveMQ does:
