http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-jcp-open/
On 7/6/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I guess everyone should look at the threads to make that determination :) -- dims On 7/6/07, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt, > > Actually I do believe a formal policy is being considered...and is under > discussion. > > Jeff > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > For those that are not subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] there is a > > discussion in progress about the current state of the Open Letter to Sun > > that Apache put out in the public a few months ago. > > > > The discussion is centered around Apache's participation in the Java > > Community Process and specifically around license terms for the > > specifications and TCKs that are used to validate our implementations. > > > > At this point there is no formal policy that is being considered. The > > discussion is about how Apache should respond to the JCP and > > specifically Sun about the their lack of response to the Open Letter. > > Since the outcome of these policies may have a significant impact on > > Geronimo as well as other Apache projects that implement solutions to > > the specifications from the JSR as well as validate them against a TCK I > > advise you to take a peek at the list. > > > > The mailing list is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Cheers. > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
